{"id":1304,"date":"2020-11-17T19:54:07","date_gmt":"2020-11-17T19:54:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/?p=1304"},"modified":"2020-11-23T19:50:37","modified_gmt":"2020-11-23T19:50:37","slug":"a-wooden-castle-scratched-in-stone-a-13th-century-graffito-from-the-castle-at-caen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/2020\/11\/17\/a-wooden-castle-scratched-in-stone-a-13th-century-graffito-from-the-castle-at-caen\/","title":{"rendered":"A wooden castle scratched in stone: a 13th-century graffito from the castle at Caen"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Dr Edward Impey, one of the UK’s leading castle experts and patron of the CST examines some C13 graffito can boost our understanding of castles. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

As every castle book reminds us, the defences of most castles before the mid-13th<\/sup> century, and the buildings within them, were built of earth and timber. The perishable nature at least of the timber parts, and their replacement in many cases in stone (obviously) makes their structural detail hard to understand, although Robert  Higham and Philip Barker\u2019s Timber Castles<\/em> of 1992, and their publication of Hen Domen (Montgomery) in 2000 achieve a great deal in this direction. As most evidence is archaeological, however, it tends to be confined to plans and layout. Herein lies the importance of this graffito, scratched into a re-used ashlar in the early 13th<\/sup> century and found during the excavation of the long-demolished donjon<\/em> in the castle at Caen in 1966: it shows, in elevation, what is unquestionably a timber-framed castle, or part of one \u2013 either a ringwork or a motte.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"

The graffito re-drawn, omitting the underlying mason\u2019s tooling and lines probably unconnected with the original image.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

To begin our description with the mound on which the buildings stand, this is marked with a series of lines inclining inwards towards the top, which may be the draughtsman\u2019s device to give it substance, or, possibly, represent baulks of timber covering the slope \u2013 a variant of the arrangement found for example at South Mimms (Hertfordshire) and elsewhere. To the extreme right, similarly striated, is what must be the counterscarp of the ditch, and springing from it, possibly propped by two trestle-like structures, is the bridge across it: this is of the so-called \u2018flying form\u2019 shown in the Bayeux Tapestry and found archaeologically at Hen Domen. At its top end the bridge abuts a tower, necessarily a gate tower, its side scored with the diagonal intersecting lines, probably representing cross-bracing of the form found in the bell towers at St Leonard\u2019s, Yarpole (1195-6) and St Mary\u2019s, Pembridge, of 1207-23 (both Herefordshire); variants are known in France and over forty post-medieval examples in central Europe. The arrangement is also shown in a carving at Modena cathedral, and in numerous 12th<\/sup> -and 13th<\/sup>– century bestiary illuminations of timber towers on the backs of elephants, prompted either by Pliny the Elder\u2019s or the Books of the Maccabees. Siege towers could be similarly constructed, hence the French term beffroi<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
. The re-drawing numbered to indicate the main features described in the text.<\/strong>
1. Revetted earthwork slope<\/strong>
2.The moat counter-scarp<\/strong>
3.Bridge<\/strong>
4.Possible trestles supporting bridge<\/strong>
5.Gate tower<\/strong>
6.Oversailing platform at tower top<\/strong>
7.Timber wall<\/strong>
8.Possible second tower<\/strong>
9.Battlement<\/strong>
10.Hoist<\/strong>
11.Hall?<\/strong>
12.Second building within the enclosure<\/strong>
Third building<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Abutting the tower is the battlemented wall or palisade, composed of edge-to-edge vertical timbers, reinforced by a horizontal rail at top and bottom and by massive diagonal or \u2018X\u2019 braces, face-nailed to the uprights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Inside the enclosure, our draughtsman has shown at least three buildings. The most prominent has a pitched roof terminating in finials, with a row of four round-headed windows under the eaves. Conceivably this was intended as a chapel, but the windows more probably belong to the clerestory of an aisled hall, as survive in the single-aisled hall of c<\/em>.1160 in the castle at Creully, seventeen kilometres north of Caen, and has been inferred in the 12th<\/sup>-century timber examples at Leicester castle and the Bishop\u2019s Palace at Hereford. In front are two lower buildings with pitched roofs, one carrying a finial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To the left of the hall is a structure consisting of a vertical pole, a cross-bar at the top, propped by diagonal braces. At first sight rather puzzling, this is clearly identifiable as a crane or hoist, thanks to the dozens of near-identical examples in medieval images, conveniently gathered together by G\u00fcnther Binding\u2019s compendium of 2001. To the right  of the pole hangs a  rope, taut  as if being pulled or winched downwards, and which is carried over the cross-bar and two faintly-indicated pulley wheels, beyond which it hangs down again and appears to be in the act of hauling a large timber into the air.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The value of the depiction can be summarised as follows. First, it may be the only contemporary representation of a timber-built motte-top or ringwork complex, and is valuable in showing the whole apparatus of palisade, battlements, bridge, gate tower and buildings within. Second, along with the Abbaye aux Dames capital, it is one of only two known representations of face-nailed \u2018X\u2019 bracing – an arrangement by definition untraceable archaeologically \u2013 which would have endowed the palisade with immense lateral strength and was perhaps widely used. Third, this may be the only contemporary representation of a Romanesque aisled hall \u2013 if that is what it is \u2013 within a castle. Fourth, as the battlemented platform at the top of the tower oversails its sides, forming a machicolation, it is one a number of images showing that such things did not derive from hourds<\/em>, but were integral at least to timber towers long before appearing in stone. Fifth, while it has long been assumed<\/em> that medieval defensive towers in timber were structurally akin to 12th-<\/sup> and 13th<\/sup>-century bell-towers, this is, apart from the Modena carving, the only one to actually show this to be so. Finally, although representing a well-known type, the crane certainly adds liveliness and interest to the composition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who the draughtsman was is, obviously, unknown. So is whether the graffito represents a real or imaginary place, although the inclusion of the crane, in use, could be taken as a hint that a particular site, where building works were under way, was indeed intended. What is clear is that it is not a picture of the castle at Caen, nor indeed of Creully, both of quite different form.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s hope that this blog and the forthcoming article (in French) will encourage the identification of other wooden castles scratched in stone, and help with their interpretation and of excavated evidence in the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Featured image: The graffito (reproduced by kind permission of the Mus\u00e9e de Normandie, Caen)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Subscribe to our quarterly newsletter<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To find out more about the working being done at Caen you can visit her: https:\/\/caen.fr\/actualite\/un-parc-paysager-la-conquete-du-chateau <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bibliography<\/p>\n\n\n\n

M. Bayl\u00e9,  La Trinit\u00e9 de Caen: sa place dans l\u2019histoire de l\u2019Architecture et du plate et du D\u00e9cor Romans<\/em> (Paris, 1979),<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A.R. Boucher and R.K. Morriss, \u2018The Bell Tower of St Mary\u2019s Church, Pembridge, Herefordshire\u2019, Vernacular Architecture<\/em>, vol. 42, issue 1, pp.23-35<\/p>\n\n\n\n

G. Binding, ed., Der Mittelalterliche Baubetrieb in zeitgen\u00f6ssischen Abbildungen, <\/em>(Darmstadt, 2001), available in translation as Medieval building techniques, <\/em>(Stroud, 2004).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

M. De Bo\u00fcard, Le Ch\u00e2teau de Caen<\/em> (Caen, 1979)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

R. Higham and P. Barker, Timber Castles<\/em> (London,1992)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

R.Higham and P.Barker, Hen Domen, Montgomery \u2013 A Timber Castle on the English Welsh Border<\/em> (Exeter, 2000),<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Karel Ku\u010da & Ji\u0159\u00ed Langer<\/a>, D\u0159ev\u011bn\u00e9 kostely a zvonice v Evrop\u011b (Timber Churches and Bell Towers in Europe), <\/em>2 vols.(Prague 2009)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

N. Molyneux, \u2018The detached bell tower, St Leonard\u2019s Parish Church, Yarpole, Herefordshire, Vernacular Architecture,<\/em> vol. 34 (2003), issue 1, pp.68-72<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dr Edward Impey, one of the UK’s leading castle experts and patron of the CST examines some C13 graffito can boost our understanding of castles. As every castle book reminds us, the defences of most castles before the mid-13th century, and the buildings within them, were built of earth and timber. The perishable nature at … Continue reading A wooden castle scratched in stone: a 13th-century graffito from the castle at Caen<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1305,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[317,320,318,321,319],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1304"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1304"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1304\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1311,"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1304\/revisions\/1311"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1305"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/castlestudiestrust.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}