Update from Visualising Canterbury Castle: the importance of the site visit

Project lead of the Canterbury Castle Visualisation project, Dr Katie McGown, gives an update on how the project is progressing.

The Visualising Canterbury Castle project is in the process of producing a new digital reconstruction of Canterbury Castle’s Norman keep. In our last post we discussed the first of a series of co-design sessions we have organised to allow a range of expertise and stakeholders to help us develop and interrogate the model we are producing. However, this is not the only way we are collating information to inform our understanding of the built structure.

Subscribe to our quarterly newsletter

Canterbury Castle has been closed to the public since 2018, and as it is currently being refurbished, the walls are obscured by scaffolding. Because of this, initially we drew heavily on Excavations at Canterbury Castle (Bennet et al, 1982) published by CAT, which features elevation and plan drawings. This helped us map out the size and shape of the building for the early stages of the model. However, over the course of the development of the project, questions have arisen about areas of the building which are no longer extant, and we’ve had to piece together information from other sources, and crucially, by visiting other castles. 

After the first co-design session our student interns, Ethan Serfontein and Joseph Seare, and Technical Lead, Mike Farrant, were invited to Rochester Castle by Dr Jeremy Ashbee, Head Properties Curator, English Heritage. Through visiting a similar structure, the team gained greater understanding of both the defining features of a Norman keep, and how we can draw evidence from the building to inform our reconstruction.

Joseph (l) and Ethan (r) from the project team visiting Rochester Castle (copyright Dr Katie McGown)

As we continued to develop the digital reconstruction, questions began to emerge about the structure of the outer staircase and how this would look. This is a difficult question to answer given that the structure no longer exists. However, the team were able to develop a better understanding of how the space might have worked by comparing their observations in Rochester with a visit to Dover Castle. Professor Alan Meades, Dr Cat Cooper, Mike, Joseph and Ethan went down to Dover and spent time discussing the differences between the three Royal Norman castles in Kent, and documenting features like the staircase. Dover Castle also gave the team the opportunity to appreciate the lovely Norman interiors.

Subscribe to our quarterly newsletter

Dover Castle Keep copyright Dr Katie McGown
Christchurch, Canterbury visualising team visiting Dover Castle, copyright Dr Katie McGown

Recently, we were able to visit Canterbury Castle, courtesy of Lian Harter from Purcell and Alison Hargreaves from Canterbury City Council. Dr Katie McGown and Cat donned high vis, hard hats, and steelies to climb the scaffolding. This visit allowed them to think about sight lines around the city, but also observe important details such as this stunning herringbone brickwork in the fireplace. The tour also gave us incredible insight into the refurbishment of the keep, and how that process might be incorporated into the eventual curriculum resource that accompanies the project.

Dr Katie McGown visiting Canterbury Castle refurbishment
Canterbury Castle refurbishment copyright Dr Katie McGown
Herringbone fireplace at Canterbury Castle, copyright Dr Katie McGown

We’ve also been thinking more broadly about how the project might fit into wider activities in development for the 2027 European Year of the Normans. Professor Leonie Hicks, Cat and Katie travelled to Caen Castle to see about possible collaborations for work at the site, and were delighted to have a detailed tour led by Curator Jean-Marie Levesque around the delicate foundations of Caen Castle’s Norman keep. The team also took the opportunity to see the Bayeux Tapestry prior to its voyage to the British Museum.  

Caen Castle, copyright Dr Katie McGown
Canterbury Castle visualisation team with Caen Castle curator Jean-Marie Levesque

Each of these visits informs the development of the digital reconstruction. For example, following the visit to Canterbury Castle, the fireplaces were adjusted to showcase the herringbone brickwork.

Original visualisation of Canterbury Castle fireplace prior to visit. Copyright Canterbury Castle Visualisation
Canterbury Castle Visualisation updated fireplace with herringbone stonework. Copyright Christchurch Canterbury Visualisation

Similarly, being able to see the refurbishment of Canterbury’s Caen stone has informed the exterior of the digital reconstruction.

Refurbishment of Canterbury Castle with new Caen stone, copyright Dr Katie McGown
Canterbury Castle Visualisation updated to include Caen stone noted in the castle restoration, copyright Christchurch Canterbury Visualisation team

The team has one final visit planned to Norwich Castle before the end of the project, and we are looking forward to continuing to develop our understanding and appreciation of Norman keeps.   

Subscribe to our quarterly newsletter

Finlaggan, Islay: a lost royal castle without a name

Dr David Caldwell, formerly of the National Museum of Scotland, has just had the results of his excavations at Finlaggan in the 1990s published by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. Here he describes one of the more unexpected outcomes of the dig.

The main aim of the Finlaggan archaeological project was to shed light on a place believed to be the centre of the Lordship of the Isles in the fourteenth and fifteenth century. It consisted of two adjacent islands, Eilean Mór (the large island) and Eilean na Comhairle (the council island), in a freshwater loch in the island of Islay off the west coast of Scotland. The site was described as a castle by the Royal Commission in their inventory of ancient monuments published in 1984, but as the author pointed out to friends and colleagues on many occasions there was no such thing. Such documentary evidence as there was suggested an unfortified, palatial complex and that is what was discovered in the excavations, a residential and administrative centre for a large lordship spanning the Western Isles and parts of the mainland, a place where new lords were made and a council of the Isles met.

Subscribe to our quarterly newsletter

Plan of Finlaggan Castle, copyright David Caldwell

But the practice of archaeology is rarely straightforward and is always likely to produce evidence contrary to the predictions required for research proposals. So it turned out that the later medieval residence of the lords was a successor to a castle of twelfth-  and thirteenth-century date. There was a substantial, 19m square masonry tower occupying all the available space on Eilean na Comhairle, connected by a stone causeway to Eilean Mór. Only tantalisingly small glimpses of castle structures could be seen here under later structures, but enough to be clear that there was a timber palisade enclosing structures including a great hall, kitchens, houses and probably a chapel. Another stone causeway provided access from the lochside.

This was clearly a major castle but no records of its existence have been found in the admittedly meagre documentary records for this part of the world. We do not know for sure who might have had it built, nor do we have any certainty about what it might have been called. Eilean Mór was known in later medieval times as the island of St Finlaggan, referencing the cult of a saint, Findlugán, a contemporary of St Columba. It is possible that that dedication is no earlier than about 1300 and has resulted in the loss of an earlier placename of Scandinavian type. Most of the surrounding farm names are Gaelicisations of Norse names.

Finlaggan Castle excavation (1994): looking west  over  plinth  16062  and  castle  wall  16025B.  A  fragment of red sandstone marks the side of the much denuded castle entrance. Copyright David Caldwell

In terms of size the Finlaggan tower is similar to the one that forms the core of Castle Rushen, now believed to have been built for Rognvald Godredsson, King of the Isles from 1188 to 1226. The masonry, with coursed, long and low rubble blocks, is similar to Finlaggan. King Rognvald is clearly a contender to be considered the builder of the Finlaggan tower. The writer, however, believes that a more likely candidate for this role was Rognvald’s rival for power in the kingdom, Ranald son of Somerled, also regarded as a king. He was the ancestor of the MacDonalds and according to later traditions, a crusader. There are two main reasons for this identification.

Reconstruction drawing of the core of Castle Rushen when first built, Isle of Man, copyright Manx Heritage
Core of Castle Rushen today, copyright Manx Heritage

First, a substantial midden deposit in the loch adjacent to Eilean na Comhairle was sampled and produced ample evidence for fine dining by a lordly or kingly household in the thirteenth century and many sherds of medieval wheel-made pottery. There is no evidence of such ceramics being manufactured anywhere in the Isles apart from the Isle of Man and so all the wheel-made pottery recovered at Finlaggan can be regarded as imports, almost all from the Scottish mainland. No Manx pottery has been recovered from Finlaggan or other Hebridean sites and no Scottish medieval pottery has been recorded from the Isle of Man. Somerled and Ranald held lands in Scotland and their activities and rise to power can be seen in the context of a Scottish push westwards that resulted in the acquisition of all the kingdom of the Isles in 1266. The Chronicle of the Kings of Man and the Isles maintained at Rushen Abbey in Man maintained that the breakup of the Kingdom of the Isles into two parts was down to Somerled’s sons.

Second, it appears that Finlaggan was an important thing (assembly) site, arguably the predecessor of Tynwald in the Isle of Man. The actual place for meetings would have been on Eilean na Comhairle. The erection of a massive tower on top of it has the appearance of a hostile act by an incoming power. It is possible that the main Islay residence for the dynasty of kings based in the Isle of Man, ancestors of Rognvald Godredsson, was Dùn Ghùaidhre. The folk of Islay are clear that it is named for King Godred Crovan who died in Islay in 1095.

The Archaeology of Finlaggan, Islay is available from the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland’s online shop, with a 20% discount for Fellows of the Society. Dr Caldwell will also be delivering a free public lecture on Finlaggan on Saturday 29 November in Edinburgh and online.

Subscribe to our quarterly newsletter